第20章
加入书架 A- A+
点击下载App,搜索"THE REPUBLIC",免费读到尾

  Andonefeaturetheywillerase,andanothertheywillputin,theyhavemadethewaysofmen,asfaraspossible,agreeabletothewaysofGod?

  Indeed,hesaid,innowaycouldtheymakeafairerpicture。

  Andnow,Isaid,arewebeginningtopersuadethosewhomyoudescribedasrushingatuswithmightandmain,thatthepainterofconstitutionsissuchanoneaswearepraising;atwhomtheyweresoveryindignantbecausetohishandswecommittedtheState;andaretheygrowingalittlecalmeratwhattheyhavejustheard?

  Muchcalmer,ifthereisanysenseinthem。

  Why,wherecantheystillfindanygroundforobjection?Willtheydoubtthatthephilosopherisaloveroftruthandbeing?

  Theywouldnotbesounreasonable。

  Orthathisnature,beingsuchaswehavedelineated,isakintothehighestgood?

  Neithercantheydoubtthis。

  Butagain,willtheytellusthatsuchanature,placedunderfavourablecircumstances,willnotbeperfectlygoodandwiseifanyeverwas?Orwilltheypreferthosewhomwehaverejected?

  Surelynot。

  Thenwilltheystillbeangryatoursaying,that,untilphilosophersbearrule,Statesandindividualswillhavenorestfromevil,norwillthisourimaginaryStateeverberealised?

  Ithinkthattheywillbelessangry。

  Shallweassumethattheyarenotonlylessangrybutquitegentle,andthattheyhavebeenconvertedandforveryshame,iffornootherreason,cannotrefusetocometoterms?

  Byallmeans,hesaid。

  Thenletussupposethatthereconciliationhasbeeneffected。

  Willanyonedenytheotherpoint,thattheremaybesonsofkingsorprinceswhoarebynaturephilosophers?

  Surelynoman,hesaid。

  Andwhentheyhavecomeintobeingwillanyonesaythattheymustofnecessitybedestroyed;thattheycanhardlybesavedisnotdeniedevenbyus;butthatinthewholecourseofagesnosingleoneofthemcanescape——whowillventuretoaffirmthis?

  Whoindeed!

  But,saidI,oneisenough;lettherebeonemanwhohasacityobedienttohiswill,andhemightbringintoexistencetheidealpolityaboutwhichtheworldissoincredulous。

  Yes,oneisenough。

  Therulermayimposethelawsandinstitutionswhichwehavebeendescribing,andthecitizensmaypossiblybewillingtoobeythem?

  Certainly。

  Andthatothersshouldapproveofwhatweapprove,isnomiracleorimpossibility?

  Ithinknot。

  Butwehavesufficientlyshown,inwhathaspreceded,thatallthis,ifonlypossible,isassuredlyforthebest。

  Wehave。

  Andnowwesaynotonlythatourlaws,iftheycouldbeenacted,wouldbeforthebest,butalsothattheenactmentofthem,thoughdifficult,isnotimpossible。

  Verygood。

  Andsowithpainandtoilwehavereachedtheendofonesubject,butmoreremainstobediscussed;——howandbywhatstudiesandpursuitswillthesavioursoftheconstitutionbecreated,andatwhatagesaretheytoapplythemselvestotheirseveralstudies?

  Certainly。

  Iomittedthetroublesomebusinessofthepossessionofwomen,andtheprocreationofchildren,andtheappointmentoftherulers,becauseIknewthattheperfectStatewouldbeeyedwithjealousyandwasdifficultofattainment;butthatpieceofclevernesswasnotofmuchservicetome,forIhadtodiscussthemallthesame。Thewomenandchildrenarenowdisposedof,buttheotherquestionoftherulersmustbeinvestigatedfromtheverybeginning。Weweresaying,asyouwillremember,thattheyweretobeloversoftheircountry,triedbythetestofpleasuresandpains,andneitherinhardships,norindangers,noratanyothercriticalmomentweretolosetheirpatriotism——hewastoberejectedwhofailed,buthewhoalwayscameforthpure,likegoldtriedintherefiner’sfire,wastobemadearuler,andtoreceivehonoursandrewardsinlifeandafterdeath。Thiswasthesortofthingwhichwasbeingsaid,andthentheargumentturnedasideandveiledherface;notlikingtostirthequestionwhichhasnowarisen。

  Iperfectlyremember,hesaid。

  Yes,myfriend,Isaid,andIthenshrankfromhazardingtheboldword;butnowletmedaretosay——thattheperfectguardianmustbeaphilosopher。

  Yes,hesaid,letthatbeaffirmed。

  Anddonotsupposethattherewillbemanyofthem;forthegiftswhichweredeemedbyustobeessentialrarelygrowtogether;theyaremostlyfoundinshredsandpatches。

  Whatdoyoumean?hesaid。

  Youareaware,Ireplied,thatquickintelligence,memory,sagacity,cleverness,andsimilarqualities,donotoftengrowtogether,andthatpersonswhopossessthemandareatthesametimehigh—spiritedandmagnanimousarenotsoconstitutedbynatureastoliveorderlyandinapeacefulandsettledmanner;theyaredrivenanywaybytheirimpulses,andallsolidprinciplegoesoutofthem。

  Verytrue,hesaid。

  Ontheotherhand,thosesteadfastnatureswhichcanbetterbedependedupon,whichinabattleareimpregnabletofearandimmovable,areequallyimmovablewhenthereisanythingtobelearned;

  theyarealwaysinatorpidstate,andareapttoyawnandgotosleepoveranyintellectualtoil。

  Quitetrue。

  Andyetweweresayingthatbothqualitieswerenecessaryinthosetowhomthehighereducationistobeimparted,andwhoaretoshareinanyofficeorcommand。

  Certainly,hesaid。

  Andwilltheybeaclasswhichisrarelyfound?

  Yes,indeed。

  Thentheaspirantmustnotonlybetestedinthoselaboursanddangersandpleasureswhichwementionedbefore,butthereisanotherkindofprobationwhichwedidnotmention——hemustbeexercisedalsoinmanykindsofknowledge,toseewhetherthesoulwillbeabletoendurethehighestofall,willfaintunderthem,asinanyotherstudiesandexercises。

  Yes,hesaid,youarequiterightintestinghim。Butwhatdoyoumeanbythehighestofallknowledge?

  Youmayremember,Isaid,thatwedividedthesoulintothreeparts;

  anddistinguishedtheseveralnaturesofjustice,temperance,courage,andwisdom?

  Indeed,hesaid,ifIhadforgotten,Ishouldnotdeservetohearmore。

  Anddoyourememberthewordofcautionwhichprecededthediscussionofthem?

  Towhatdoyourefer?

  Weweresaying,ifIamnotmistaken,thathewhowantedtoseethemintheirperfectbeautymusttakealongerandmorecircuitousway,attheendofwhichtheywouldappear;butthatwecouldaddonapopularexpositionofthemonalevelwiththediscussionwhichhadpreceded。Andyourepliedthatsuchanexpositionwouldbeenoughforyou,andsotheenquirywascontinuedinwhattomeseemedtobeaveryinaccuratemanner;whetheryouweresatisfiedornot,itisforyoutosay。

  Yes,hesaid,Ithoughtandtheothersthoughtthatyougaveusafairmeasureoftruth。

  But,myfriend,Isaid,ameasureofsuchthingsWhichinanydegreefallsshortofthewholetruthisnotfairmeasure;fornothingimperfectisthemeasureofanything,althoughpersonsaretooapttobecontentedandthinkthattheyneedsearchnofurther。

  Notanuncommoncasewhenpeopleareindolent。

  Yes,Isaid;andtherecannotbeanyworsefaultinaguardianoftheStateandofthelaws。

  True。

  Theguardianthen,Isaid,mustberequiredtotakethelongercircuit,andtollatlearningaswellasatgymnastics,orhewillneverreachthehighestknowledgeofallwhich,aswewerejustnowsaying,ishispropercalling。

  What,hesaid,isthereaknowledgestillhigherthanthis——higherthanjusticeandtheothervirtues?

  Yes,Isaid,thereis。Andofthevirtuestoowemustbeholdnottheoutlinemerely,asatpresent——nothingshortofthemostfinishedpictureshouldsatisfyus。Whenlittlethingsareelaboratedwithaninfinityofpains,inorderthattheymayappearintheirfullbeautyandutmostclearness,howridiculousthatweshouldnotthinkthehighesttruthsworthyofattainingthehighestaccuracy!

  Arightnoblethought;butdoyousupposethatweshallrefrainfromaskingyouwhatisthishighestknowledge?

  Nay,Isaid,askifyouwill;butIamcertainthatyouhaveheardtheanswermanytimes,andnowyoueitherdonotunderstandmeor,asIratherthink,youaredisposedtobetroublesome;foryouhaveofbeentoldthattheideaofgoodisthehighestknowledge,andthatallotherthingsbecomeusefulandadvantageousonlybytheiruseofthis。

  YoucanhardlybeignorantthatofthisIwasabouttospeak,concerningwhich,asyouhaveoftenheardmesay,weknowsolittle;

  and,withoutwhich,anyotherknowledgeorpossessionofanykindwillprofitusnothing。Doyouthinkthatthepossessionofallotherthingsisofanyvalueifwedonotpossessthegood?ortheknowledgeofallotherthingsifwehavenoknowledgeofbeautyandgoodness?

  Assuredlynot。

  Youarefurtherawarethatmostpeopleaffirmpleasuretobethegood,butthefinersortofwitssayitisknowledgeYes。

  Andyouareawaretoothatthelattercannotexplainwhattheymeanbyknowledge,butareobligedafteralltosayknowledgeofthegood?

  Howridiculous!

  Yes,Isaid,thattheyshouldbeginbyreproachinguswithourignoranceofthegood,andthenpresumeourknowledgeofit——forthegoodtheydefinetobeknowledgeofthegood,justasifweunderstoodthemwhentheyusetheterm’good’——thisisofcourseridiculous。

  Mosttrue,hesaid。

  Andthosewhomakepleasuretheirgoodareinequalperplexity;

  fortheyarecompelledtoadmitthattherearebadpleasuresaswellasgood。

  Certainly。

  Andthereforetoacknowledgethatbadandgoodarethesame?

  True。

  Therecanbenodoubtaboutthenumerousdifficultiesinwhichthisquestionisinvolved。

  Therecanbenone。

  Further,dowenotseethatmanyarewillingtodoortohaveortoseemtobewhatisjustandhonourablewithoutthereality;butnooneissatisfiedwiththeappearanceofgood——therealityiswhattheyseek;inthecaseofthegood,appearanceisdespisedbyeveryone。

  Verytrue,hesaid。

  Ofthisthen,whicheverysoulofmanpursuesandmakestheendofallhisactions,havingapresentimentthatthereissuchanend,andyethesitatingbecauseneitherknowingthenaturenorhavingthesameassuranceofthisasofotherthings,andthereforelosingwhatevergoodthereisinotherthings,——ofaprinciplesuchandsogreatasthisoughtthebestmeninourState,towhomeverythingisentrusted,tobeinthedarknessofignorance?

  Certainlynot,hesaid。

  Iamsure,Isaid,thathewhodoesnotknownowthebeautifulandthejustarelikewisegoodwillbebutasorryguardianofthem;andI

  suspectthatnoonewhoisignorantofthegoodwillhaveatrueknowledgeofthem。

  That,hesaid,isashrewdsuspicionofyours。

  AndifweonlyhaveaguardianwhohasthisknowledgeourStatewillbeperfectlyordered?

  Ofcourse,hereplied;butIwishthatyouwouldtellmewhetheryouconceivethissupremeprincipleofthegoodtobeknowledgeorpleasure,ordifferentfromeither。

  Aye,Isaid,Iknewallalongthatafastidiousgentlemanlikeyouwouldnotbecontentedwiththethoughtsofotherpeopleaboutthesematters。

  True,Socrates;butImustsaythatonewholikeyouhaspassedalifetimeinthestudyofphilosophyshouldnotbealwaysrepeatingtheopinionsofothers,andnevertellinghisown。

  Well,buthasanyonearighttosaypositivelywhathedoesnotknow?

  Not,hesaid,withtheassuranceofpositivecertainty;hehasnorighttodothat:buthemaysaywhathethinks,asamatterofopinion。

  Anddoyounotknow,Isaid,thatallmereopinionsarebad,andthebestofthemblind?Youwouldnotdenythatthosewhohaveanytruenotionwithoutintelligenceareonlylikeblindmenwhofeeltheirwayalongtheroad?

  Verytrue。

  Anddoyouwishtobeholdwhatisblindandcrookedandbase,whenotherswilltellyouofbrightnessandbeauty?

  GLAUCON—SOCRATES

  Still,Imustimploreyou,Socrates,saidGlaucon,nottoturnawayjustasyouarereachingthegoal;ifyouwillonlygivesuchanexplanationofthegoodasyouhavealreadygivenofjusticeandtemperanceandtheothervirtues,weshallbesatisfied。

  Yes,myfriend,andIshallbeatleastequallysatisfied,butI

  cannothelpfearingthatIshallfall,andthatmyindiscreetzealwillbringridiculeuponme。No,sweetsirs,letusnotatpresentaskwhatistheactualnatureofthegood,fortoreachwhatisnowinmythoughtswouldbeanefforttoogreatforme。Butofthechildofthegoodwhoislikesthim,Iwouldfainspeak,ifIcouldbesurethatyouwishedtohear——otherwise,not。

  Byallmeans,hesaid,tellusaboutthechild,andyoushallremaininourdebtfortheaccountoftheparent。

  Idoindeedwish,Ireplied,thatIcouldpay,andyoureceive,theaccountoftheparent,andnot,asnow,oftheoffspringonly;

  take,however,thislatterbywayofinterest,andatthesametimehaveacarethatidonotrenderafalseaccount,althoughIhavenointentionofdeceivingyou。

  Yes,wewilltakeallthecarethatwecan:proceed。

  Yes,Isaid,butImustfirstcometoanunderstandingwithyou,andremindyouofwhatIhavementionedinthecourseofthisdiscussion,andatmanyothertimes。

  What?

  Theoldstory,thatthereisamanybeautifulandamanygood,andsoofotherthingswhichwedescribeanddefine;toallofthem’many’

  isapplied。

  True,hesaid。

  Andthereisanabsolutebeautyandanabsolutegood,andofotherthingstowhichtheterm’many’isappliedthereisanabsolute;fortheymaybebroughtunderasingleidea,whichiscalledtheessenceofeach。

  Verytrue。

  Themany,aswesay,areseenbutnotknown,andtheideasareknownbutnotseen。

  Exactly。

  Andwhatistheorganwithwhichweseethevisiblethings?

  Thesight,hesaid。

  Andwiththehearing,Isaid,wehear,andwiththeothersensesperceivetheotherobjectsofsense?

  True。

  Buthaveyouremarkedthatsightisbyfarthemostcostlyandcomplexpieceofworkmanshipwhichtheartificerofthesensesevercontrived?

  No,Ineverhave,hesaid。

  Thenreflect;hastheearorvoiceneedofanythirdoradditionalnatureinorderthattheonemaybeabletohearandtheothertobeheard?

  Nothingofthesort。

  No,indeed,Ireplied;andthesameistrueofmost,ifnotall,theothersenses——youwouldnotsaythatanyofthemrequiressuchanaddition?

  Certainlynot。

  Butyouseethatwithouttheadditionofsomeothernaturethereisnoseeingorbeingseen?

  Howdoyoumean?

  Sightbeing,asIconceive,intheeyes,andhewhohaseyeswantingtosee;colourbeingalsopresentinthem,stillunlesstherebeathirdnaturespeciallyadaptedtothepurpose,theowneroftheeyeswillseenothingandthecolourswillbeinvisible。

  Ofwhatnatureareyouspeaking?

  Ofthatwhichyoutermlight,Ireplied。

  True,hesaid。

  Noble,then,isthebondwhichlinkstogethersightandvisibility,andgreatbeyondotherbondsbynosmalldifferenceofnature;forlightistheirbond,andlightisnoignoblething?

  Nay,hesaid,thereverseofignoble。

  Andwhich,Isaid,ofthegodsinheavenwouldyousaywasthelordofthiselement?Whoseisthatlightwhichmakestheeyetoseeperfectlyandthevisibletoappear?

  Youmeanthesun,asyouandallmankindsay。

  Maynottherelationofsighttothisdeitybedescribedasfollows?

  How?

  Neithersightnortheeyeinwhichsightresidesisthesun?

  No。

  Yetofalltheorgansofsensetheeyeisthemostlikethesun?

  Byfarthemostlike。

  Andthepowerwhichtheeyepossessesisasortofeffluencewhichisdispensedfromthesun?

  Exactly。

  Thenthesunisnotsight,buttheauthorofsightwhoisrecognisedbysight。

  True,hesaid。

  AndthisishewhomIcallthechildofthegood,whomthegoodbegatinhisownlikeness,tobeinthevisibleworld,inrelationtosightandthethingsofsight,whatthegoodisintheintellectualworldinrelationtomindandthethingsofmind。

  Willyoubealittlemoreexplicit?hesaid。

  Why,youknow,Isaid,thattheeyes,whenapersondirectsthemtowardsobjectsonwhichthelightofdayisnolongershining,butthemoonandstarsonly,seedimly,andarenearlyblind;theyseemtohavenoclearnessofvisioninthem?

  Verytrue。

  Butwhentheyaredirectedtowardsobjectsonwhichthesunshines,theyseeclearlyandthereissightinthem?

  Certainly。

  Andthesoulisliketheeye:whenrestinguponthatonwhichtruthandbeingshine,thesoulperceivesandunderstandsandisradiantwithintelligence;butwhenturnedtowardsthetwilightofbecomingandperishing,thenshehasopiniononly,andgoesblinkingabout,andisfirstofoneopinionandthenofanother,andseemstohavenointelligence?

  Justso。

  Now,thatwhichimpartstruthtotheknownandthepowerofknowingtotheknoweriswhatIwouldhaveyoutermtheideaofgood,andthisyouwilldeemtobethecauseofscience,andoftruthinsofarasthelatterbecomesthesubjectofknowledge;

  beautifultoo,asarebothtruthandknowledge,youwillberightinesteemingthisothernatureasmorebeautifulthaneither;and,asinthepreviousinstance,lightandsightmaybetrulysaidtobelikethesun,andyetnottobethesun,sointhisothersphere,scienceandtruthmaybedeemedtobelikethegood,butnotthegood;thegoodhasaplaceofhonouryethigher。

  Whatawonderofbeautythatmustbe,hesaid,whichistheauthorofscienceandtruth,andyetsurpassestheminbeauty;foryousurelycannotmeantosaythatpleasureisthegood?

  Godforbid,Ireplied;butmayIaskyoutoconsidertheimageinanotherpointofview?

  Inwhatpointofview?

  Youwouldsay,wouldyounot,thatthesunisonlytheauthorofvisibilityinallvisiblethings,butofgenerationandnourishmentandgrowth,thoughhehimselfisnotgeneration?

  Certainly。

  Inlikemannerthegoodmaybesaidtobenotonlytheauthorofknowledgetoallthingsknown,butoftheirbeingandessence,andyetthegoodisnotessence,butfarexceedsessenceindignityandpower。

  Glauconsaid,withaludicrousearnestness:Bythelightofheaven,howamazing!

  Yes,Isaid,andtheexaggerationmaybesetdowntoyou;foryoumademeuttermyfancies。

  Andpraycontinuetoutterthem;atanyrateletushearifthereisanythingmoretobesaidaboutthesimilitudeofthesun。

  Yes,Isaid,thereisagreatdealmore。

  Thenomitnothing,howeverslight。

  Iwilldomybest,Isaid;butIshouldthinkthatagreatdealwillhavetobeomitted。

  Youhavetoimagine,then,thattherearetworulingpowers,andthatoneofthemissetovertheintellectualworld,theotheroverthevisible。Idonotsayheaven,lestyoushouldfancythatIamplayinguponthename(’ourhanoz,orhatoz’)。MayIsupposethatyouhavethisdistinctionofthevisibleandintelligiblefixedinyourmind?

  Ihave。

  Nowtakealinewhichhasbeencutintotwounequalparts,anddivideeachofthemagaininthesameproportion,andsupposethetwomaindivisionstoanswer,onetothevisibleandtheothertotheintelligible,andthencomparethesubdivisionsinrespectoftheirclearnessandwantofclearness,andyouwillfindthatthefirstsectioninthesphereofthevisibleconsistsofimages。AndbyimagesImean,inthefirstplace,shadows,andinthesecondplace,reflectionsinwaterandinsolid,smoothandpolishedbodiesandthelike:Doyouunderstand?

  Yes,Iunderstand。

  Imagine,now,theothersection,ofwhichthisisonlytheresemblance,toincludetheanimalswhichwesee,andeverythingthatgrowsorismade。

  Verygood。

  Wouldyounotadmitthatboththesectionsofthisdivisionhavedifferentdegreesoftruth,andthatthecopyistotheoriginalasthesphereofopinionistothesphereofknowledge?

  Mostundoubtedly。

  Nextproceedtoconsiderthemannerinwhichthesphereoftheintellectualistobedivided。

  Inwhatmanner?

  Thus:——Therearetwosubdivisions,inthelowerorwhichthesoulusesthefiguresgivenbytheformerdivisionasimages;theenquirycanonlybehypothetical,andinsteadofgoingupwardstoaprincipledescendstotheotherend;inthehigherofthetwo,thesoulpassesoutofhypotheses,andgoesuptoaprinciplewhichisabovehypotheses,makingnouseofimagesasintheformercase,butproceedingonlyinandthroughtheideasthemselves。

  Idonotquiteunderstandyourmeaning,hesaid。

  ThenIwilltryagain;youwillunderstandmebetterwhenIhavemadesomepreliminaryremarks。Youareawarethatstudentsofgeometry,arithmetic,andthekindredsciencesassumetheoddandtheevenandthefiguresandthreekindsofanglesandthelikeintheirseveralbranchesofscience;thesearetheirhypotheses,whichtheyandeverybodyaresupposedtoknow,andthereforetheydonotdeigntogiveanyaccountofthemeithertothemselvesorothers;

  buttheybeginwiththem,andgoonuntiltheyarriveatlast,andinaconsistentmanner,attheirconclusion?

  Yes,hesaid,Iknow。

点击下载App,搜索"THE REPUBLIC",免费读到尾