Criticism and Fiction

第3章

试读中

第3章

Criticism and Fiction William Dean Howells

后面的故事,去 App 接着看,下载后搜索书名即可继续阅读。

Criticism and Fiction
阅读主题
字体大小

  ……Oh,fortunate,Mysisters,whointheheroicdawnOfracessung!TothemdiddestinygiveThevirginfireandchasteingenuousnessOftheirland’sspeech;and,reverenced,theirhandsRanoverpotentstrings。\"ItwillneverdotoallowthatweareatsuchadesperatepassinEnglish,butsomethingofthisdivinedespairwemayfeeltoointhinkingof\"thespacioustimesofgreatElizabeth,\"whenthepoetsweretryingthestopsoftheyounglanguage,andthrillingwiththesurprisesoftheirownmusic。Wemaycomfortourselves,however,unlesswepreferaluxuryofgrief,byrememberingthatnolanguageiseveroldonthelipsofthosewhospeakit,nomatterhowdecrepititdropsfromthepen。

  Wehaveonlytoleaveourstudies,editorialandother,andgointotheshopsandfieldstofindthe\"spacioustimes\"again;andfromthebeginningRealism,beforeshehadputonhercapitalletter,haddivinedthisnear—at—handtruthalongwiththerest。Lowell,almostthegreatestandfinestrealistwhoeverwroughtinverse,showedusthatElizabethwasstillQueenwhereheheardYankeefarmerstalk。Oneneednotinviteslangintothecompanyofitsbetters,thoughperhapsslanghasbeendroppingits\"s\"andbecominglanguageeversincetheworldbegan,andiscertainlysometimesdelightfulandforciblebeyondthereachofthedictionary。Iwouldnothaveanyonegoaboutfornewwords,butifoneofthemcameaptly,nottorejectitshelp。ForournoveliststotrytowriteAmericanly,fromanymotive,wouldbeadismalerror,butbeingbornAmericans,Ithenuse\"Americanisms\"whenevertheseservetheirturn;andwhentheircharactersspeak,IshouldliketohearthemspeaktrueAmerican,withallthevaryingTennesseean,Philadelphian,Bostonian,andNewYorkaccents。Ifwebotherourselvestowritewhatthecriticsimaginetobe\"English,\"weshallbepriggishandartificial,andstillmoresoifwemakeourAmericanstalk\"English。\"Thereisalsothisseriousdisadvantageabout\"English,\"thatifwewrotethebest\"English\"intheworld,probablytheEnglishthemselveswouldnotknowit,or,iftheydid,certainlywouldnotownit。Ithasalwaysbeensupposedbygrammariansandpuriststhatalanguagecanbekeptastheyfindit;butlanguages,whiletheylive,areperpetuallychanging。Godapparentlymeantthemforthecommonpeople;andthecommonpeoplewillusethemfreelyastheyuseothergiftsofGod。OntheirlipsourcontinentalEnglishwilldiffermoreandmorefromtheinsularEnglish,andIbelievethatthisisnotdeplorable,butdesirable。

  Infine,IwouldhaveourAmericannovelistsbeasAmericanastheyunconsciouslycan。MatthewArnoldcomplainedthathefoundno\"distinction\"inourlife,andIwouldgladlypersuadeallartistsintendinggreatnessinanykindamongusthattherecognitionofthefactpointedoutbyMr。Arnoldoughttobeasourceofinspirationtothem,andnotdiscouragement。Wehavebeennowsomehundredyearsbuildingupastateontheaffirmationoftheessentialequalityofmenintheirrightsandduties,andwhetherwehavebeenrightorbeenwrongthegodshavetakenusatourword,andhaverespondedtouswithacivilizationinwhichthereisno\"distinction\"perceptibletotheeyethatlovesandvaluesit。Suchbeautyandsuchgrandeuraswehaveiscommonbeauty,commongrandeur,orthebeautyandgrandeurinwhichthequalityofsolidaritysoprevailsthatneitherdistinguishesitselftothedisadvantageofanythingelse。Itseemstomethattheseconditionsinvitetheartisttothestudyandtheappreciationofthecommon,andtotheportrayalineveryartofthosefinerandhigheraspectswhichuniteratherthanseverhumanity,ifhewouldthriveinourneworderofthings。Thetalentthatisrobustenoughtofronttheevery—dayworldandcatchthecharmofitswork—worn,care—worn,brave,kindlyface,neednotfeartheencounter,thoughitseemsterribletothesortnurturedinthesuperstitionoftheromantic,thebizarre,theheroic,thedistinguished,asthethingsaloneworthyofpaintingorcarvingorwriting。Theartsmustbecomedemocratic,andthenweshallhavetheexpressionofAmericainart;andthereproachwhichArnoldwashalfrightinmakingusshallhavenojusticeinitanylonger;weshallbe\"distinguished。\"

  XXII。

  Inthemeantimeithasbeensaidwithasuperficialjusticethatourfictionisnarrow;thoughinthesamesenseIsupposethepresentEnglishfictionisasnarrowasourown;andmostmodernfictionisnarrowinacertainsense。InItalythebestmenarewritingnovelsasbriefandrestrictedinrangeasours;inSpainthenovelsareintenseanddeep,andnotspacious;theFrenchschool,withtheexceptionofZola,isnarrow;theNorwegiansarenarrow;theRussians,exceptTolstoy,arenarrow,andthenextgreatestafterhim,Tourguenief,isthenarrowestgreatnovelist,astomeredimensions,thateverlived,dealingnearlyalwayswithsmallgroups,isolatedandanalyzedinthemostAmericanfashion。Infact,thechargeofnarrownessaccusesthewholetendencyofmodernfictionasmuchastheAmericanschool。ButIdonotbyanymeansallowthatthisnarrownessisadefect,whiledenyingthatitisauniversalcharacteristicofourfiction;itisrather,forthepresent,avirtue。Indeed,IshouldcallthepresentAmericanwork,NorthandSouth,thoroughratherthannarrow。Inonesenseitisasbroadaslife,foreachmanisamicrocosm,andthewriterwhoisabletoacquaintusintimatelywithhalfadozenpeople,ortheconditionsofaneighborhoodoraclass,hasdonesomethingwhichcannotinany,badsensebecallednarrow;hisbreadthisverticalinsteadoflateral,thatisall;andthisdepthismoredesirablethanhorizontalexpansioninacivilizationlikeours,wherethedifferencesarenotofclasses,butoftypes,andnotoftypeseithersomuchasofcharacters。Anewmethodwasnecessaryindealingwiththenewconditions,andthenewmethodisworldwide,becausethewholeworldismoreorlessAmericanized。Tolstoyisexceptionallyvoluminousamongmodernwriters,evenRussianwriters;anditmightbesaidthattheforteofTolstoyhimselfisnotinhisbreadthsidewise,butinhisbreadthupwardanddownward。’TheDeathofIvanIlyitch’

后续内容在 App 继续看

精彩内容未完,打开 App 继续阅读

后面的故事已为你准备好,下载 App 后搜索“Criticism and Fiction”即可继续阅读这一章。