’Responsibility，’indeed，alwaysimpliesliberty——theexistenceofaspherewithinwhichaman’sfortunesdependuponhispersonalcharacter，andhischaractershoulddeterminehisfortune。But，asMillcanmostclearlyrecognise，socialresponsibilitymeanssomethingmore。Onemost’certainincident’
ofsocialprogressisthegrowthofco-operation，andthatinvolves，ashesays，the’subordinationofindividualcaprice’
toa’preconceiveddetermination’andtheperformanceofpartsallottedina’combinedundertaking。’25*Theindividual，then，ispartofanorganisation，inwhicheveryindividualshouldplayhispart。Theover-centralisationwhichwouldcrushhimintoanautomatonisnotmorefatalthantheindividualindependencewhichwouldbeincompatiblewithorganisation。Thedesirable’responsibility’isnotthatofaRobinsonCrusoebutthatofthesoldierinanarmy。Itshouldbeenforcedbyothermotivesthanmereself-interest，foritaffectstheinterestsofthewholebodycorporate。NowMill，believingeventoexcessinthepowerofeducation，includedineducationthewholedisciplineoflifeduetotherelationsoftheindividualtohissocialenvironment；
anditishisessentialprinciplethatthisforceshouldbedirectedtoenforcingasenseof’responsibility’inthewidestacceptationoftheword。
V。POLITICALAPPLICATION