Lectures on the Early History of Institutions

第28章

试读中

第28章

Lectures on the Early History of Institutions 佚名

后面的故事,去 App 接着看,下载后搜索书名即可继续阅读。

Lectures on the Early History of Institutions
阅读主题
字体大小

  AlmosteverygestureandalmosteverysetofformalwordsintheLegisActioSacramentisymbolisesomethingwhich,insomepartoftheworldoranother,insomeAryansocietyoranother,hasdevelopedintoanimportantinstitution。Theclaimantplaceshishandontheslaveorothersubjectofdispute,andthisgraspofthethingclaimed,whichisreproducedinthecorrespondingprocedureoftheancientGermansandwhich,fromthem,wascontinuedinvariousmodifiedformsfardownintotheMiddleAges,isanearlyexampleofthatdemandbeforeactiononwhichallcivilisedsystemsoflawinsist。Thewand,whichtheclaimantheldinhishand,isstatedbyGaiustohaverepresentedaspear,andthespear,theemblemofthestrongmanarmed,servedasthesymbolofpropertyheldabsolutelyandagainsttheworld,notonlyintheRomanbutinseveralotherWesternsocieties。Theproceedingsincludedaseriesofassertionsandreassertionsofrightbytheparties,andthisformaldialoguewastheparentoftheArtofPleading。Thequarrelbetweenplaintiffanddefendant,whichwasamerepretenceamongtheRomans,longremainedarealityinothersocieties,and,thoughitstheorywasaltered,itsurvivedintheWagerofBattlewhich,asanEnglishinstitution,wasonlyfinallyabolishedinourfathers’day。TheinterpositionofthePraetorandtheacceptanceofhismediationexpandedintotheAdministrationofJusticeintheRomanState,oneofthemostpowerfulofinstrumentalitiesinthehistoricaltransformationofthecivilisedworld。Thedisputantsstakedasumofmoney——theSacramentum,fromwhichtheproceedingstooktheirname——onthemeritsoftheirquarrel,andthestakewentintothepublicexchequer。Themoneythuswagered,whichappearsinasingularlylargenumberofarchaiclegalsystems,istheearliestrepresentativeofthoseCourt-feeswhichhavebeenamoreconsiderablepowerinlegalhistorythanhistoriansoflawarealtogetherinclinedtoadmit。TheveryspiritinwhichaLegisActiowasconductedwasthatwhich,intheeyesoflaymen,hasbeenmostcharacteristicoflawyersinallhistoricaltimes。

  If,SaysGaius。yousuedbyLegisActioforinjurytoyourvines,andcalledthemvines,youwouldfail;youmustcallthemtrees,becausethetextoftheTwelveTablesspokeonlyoftrees。TheancientcollectionofTeutoniclegalformulas,knownastheMalbergGloss,containsprovisionsofpreciselythesamecharacter。Ifyousueforabull,youwillmiscarryifyoudescribehimasabull;youmustgivehimhisancientjuridicaldesignationof’leaderoftheherd。’Youmustcalltheforefingerthe’arrow’-finger,thegoatthe’browseruponleeks。’TherearelawyersalivewhocanrecollectwhentheEnglishsystemofSpecialPleading,nowjustexpiring,wasapplieduponprinciplesnotremotelyakintotheseandhistoricallydescendedfromthem。

  ThedescriptiongivenbyGaiusoftheLegisActioSacramentiisfollowedbyalacunainthemanuscript。ItwasonceoccupiedwithanaccountoftheJudicisPostulatio,whichwasevidentlyamodificationoftheolderSacramentalActionbywhichthisancientremedywasadaptedtoaparticularclassofcases。ThetextofthetreatisebeginsagainwithadescriptionoftheCondictio,whichissaidbyGaiustohavebeencreated,butwhichisbelievedtohavebeenonlyregulated,bytwoRomanstatutesofthesixthcenturyofRome——theLexSiliaandtheLexCalpurnia。

  TheCondictio,whichafterwardsdevelopedintooneofthemostusefuloftheRomanactions,originallyderiveditsnamefromanoticewhichtheplaintiffgavethedefendanttoappearbeforethePraetorinthirtydays,inorderthataJudexorrefereemightbenominated;andimmediatelyasImyselfthinkonthisnoticebeinggiven,thepartiesenteredintoa’sponsio’and’restipulatio,’thatis,theylaidaformalwagerdistinctfromthestakecalledSacramentumonthejusticeoftheirrespectivecontentions。Thesumthusstaked,whichwasalwaysequaltoathirdoftheamountindispute,wentintheendtothesuccessfullitigant,andnot,liketheSacramentum,totheState。Lawyerswondered,Gaiustellsus,thatsuchanactionshouldbeneededwhenpropertycouldhavebeenrecoveredbytheolderandunmodifiedprocedure。ManytechnicalanswerstothisquestionhavebeengivenbymoderncommentatorsonRomanlaw,butwewillseewhetherabetterexplanationofitcannotbeobtainedbyapproachingitfromanotherside。

  Gaius,leavingtheCondictio,proceedstodiscusstwooftheLegisActiones,theManusInjectioandthePignorisCapio,whichcannotbemadetosquareinanywaywithourmodernconceptionofanaction。TheManusInjectioisexpresslystatedtohavebeenoriginallytheRomanmodeofexecutionagainstthepersonofajudgmentdebtor。Ithasconsiderablehistoricalinterest,foritwasundoubtedlytheinstrumentofthecrueltiespractisedbytheRomanaristocracyontheirdefaultingplebeiandebtors,andthusitgavethefirstimpetustoaseriesofpopularmovementswhichaffectedthewholehistoryoftheRomanCommonwealth。ThePignorisCapioalso,possiblyunderaslightlyalteredname,wasamodeofexecutioninlatertimesagainstpropertyafterdecree;

后续内容在 App 继续看

精彩内容未完,打开 App 继续阅读

后面的故事已为你准备好,下载 App 后搜索“Lectures on the Early History of Institutions”即可继续阅读这一章。