Lectures on the Early History of Institutions

第2章

试读中

第2章

Lectures on the Early History of Institutions 佚名

后面的故事,去 App 接着看,下载后搜索书名即可继续阅读。

Lectures on the Early History of Institutions
阅读主题
字体大小

  theyarealsoacollectionofruleswhichhavebeengraduallydevelopedinawayhighlyfavourabletothepreservationofarchaicpeculiarities。Twocauseshavedonemosttoobscuretheoldestinstitutionsoftheportionofthehumanracetowhichwebelong:onehasbeentheformationthroughouttheWestofstrongcentralisedgovernments,concentratinginthemselvesthepublicforceofthecommunity,andenabledtogivetothatforceuponoccasionthespecialformoflegislativepower;theotherhasbeentheinfluence,directandindirect,oftheRomanEmpire,drawingwithitanactivityinlegislationunknowntothepartsoftheworldwhichwereneversubjectedtoit。Now,IrelandisallowedonallhandstohaveneverformedpartoftheEmpire;itwasveryslightlyaffectedfromadistancebytheImperiallaw;

  and,evenifitbeadmittedthat,duringcertainintervalsofitsancienthistory,ithadacentralgovernment,assuredlythisgovernmentwasneverastrongone。UnderthesecircumstancesitisnotwonderfulthattheBrehonlaw,growingtogetherwithoutlegislationuponanoriginalbodyofAryancustom,andformedbeyondthelimitofthatcloudofRomanjuridicalideaswhichformanycenturiesoverspreadthewholeContinent,andevenatitsextremityextendedtoEngland,shouldpresentsomeverystronganalogiestoanothersetofderivativeAryanusages,theHindoolaw,whichwassimilarlydeveloped。Thecuriousandperplexingproblemswhichsuchamodeofgrowthsuggestshavetograppledwithbythestudentofeithersystem。

  TheancientlawsofIrelandhavecomedowntousasanassemblageoflaw-tracts,eachtreatingofsomeonesubjectorofagroupofsubjects。Thevolumesofficiallytranslatedandpublishedcontainthetwolargestofthesetracts,theSenchusMor,orGreatBookoftheAncientLaw,andtheBookofAicill。

  WhilethecomparisonoftheSenchusMorandoftheBookofAicillwithotherextantbodiesofarchaicrulesleavesnodoubtofthegreatantiquityofmuchoftheircontents,theactualperiodatwhichtheyassumedtheirpresentshapeisextremelyuncertain。MrWhitleyStokes,oneofthemosteminentoflivingCelticscholars,believes,uponconsiderationofitsverbalforms,thattheSenchusMorwascompiledinorperhapsslightlybeforetheeleventhcentury;andthereappearstobeinternalevidencewhichonthewholeallowsustoattributetheBookofAicilltothecenturypreceding。TheSenchusMor,itistrue,expresslyclaimsforitselfafarearlierorigin。Inaremarkablepreface,ofwhichIshallhavemuchtosayhereafter,itgivesanaccount,partlyinverse,ofthecircumstancesunderwhichitwasdrawnup,anditprofessestohavebeencompiledduringthelifeandunderthepersonalinfluenceofStPatrick。Thesepretensionshavebeeningeniouslysupported,butthereisnotmuchtemerity,Ithink,inrefusingtoacceptthefifthcenturyasthedateoftheSenchusMor。AtthesametimeitisfarfromimpossiblethatthewritingoftheancientIrishlawsbegansoonaftertheChristianisationofIreland。ItwasChristianity,a’religionofabook’,whichforthefirsttimeintroducedmanyoftherudernationsoutsidetheEmpiretotheartofwriting。WecannotsafelyclaimfortheChristianera,preciselythesamedegreeofculturewhichCaesarattributestotheCeltsoftheContinentinthefirstcenturybeforeChrist;but,evenifwecoulddoso,CaesarexpresslystatesoftheGaulsthat,thoughtheywereacquaintedwithwriting,theyhadsuperstitiousscruplesaboutusingwrittencharacterstopreserveanypartoftheirsacredliterature,inwhichtheirlawwouldthenbeincluded。Suchobjectionswould,however,necessarilydisappearwiththeconversionoftheIrishpeopletoChristianity。Onthewholethereisnoantecedentimprobabilityinthetraditionthat,soonafterthisconversion,theusagesoftheIrishbegantobestatedinwriting,andCelticscholarshavedetectednotalittleevidencethatpartsofthesemorevenerablewritingsareimbeddedinthetextoftheBookofAicillandoftheSenchusMor。

  Itisextremelylikelythatthemostancientlawwaspreservedinrudeverseorrhythmicalprose。IntheoldestIrishtraditionsthelawyerisdistinguishedwithdifficultyfromthepoet,poetryfromliterature。BothintheSenchusMorandintheBookofAicilltheexpressstatementofthelawisdescribedas’castingathreadofpoetry’aboutit,andthetraditionalauthorsoftheSenchusMoraresaidtohaveexhibited’allthejudgementsandpoetryofthemenofErin。’ModernIrishscholarshiphas,infact,discoveredthatportionsoftheSenchusMorarereallyinverse。Thephenomenonisnotunfamiliar。MrGrote,speakingoftheElegiacsofSolon,andofthenaturalpriorityofversetoprose,saysHistoryofGreece,iii。119,’theacquisitionsaswellastheeffusionsofanintellectualman,eveninthesimplestform,thenadjustedthemselvesnottothelimitationsoftheperiodandsemicolon,buttothoseofthehexameterandpentameter。’Thereisnoquestion,Iconceive,thatthisancientwrittenverseiswhatisnowcalledasurvival,descendingtothefirstagesofwrittencompositionfromtheageswhenmeasuredrhythmwasabsolutelyessential,inorderthatthememorymightbearthevastburdensplaceduponit。ItisnowgenerallyagreedthatthevoluminousversifiedSanscritliterature,whichembracesnotonlythepoetryoftheHindoos,butmostoftheirreligion,muchofwhatstandstotheminplaceofhistory,andsomethingevenoftheirlaw,wasoriginallypreservedbyrecollectionandpublishedbyrecitation;andevennow,intheSanscritschoolswhichremain,thepupilistrainedtoexercisesofmemorywhicharelittleshortofthemiraculoustoanEnglishman。

后续内容在 App 继续看

精彩内容未完,打开 App 继续阅读

后面的故事已为你准备好,下载 App 后搜索“Lectures on the Early History of Institutions”即可继续阅读这一章。