Thesimplepowerofthenationallegislatureistoprescribeauniformruleofnaturalization，andtheexerciseofthispowerexhaustsit，sofarasrespectstheindividual。Theconstitutionthentakeshimup，and，amongotherfights，extendstohimthecapacityofsuinginthecourtsoftheUnitedStates，preciselyunderthesamecircumstances，underwhichanativemightsue。Heisdistinguishableinnothingfromanativecitizen，exceptsofarastheconstitutionmakesthedistinction。Thelawmakesnone。Thereis，then，noresemblancebetweentheactincorporatingthebank，andthegeneralnaturalizationlaw。Uponthebestconsideration，wehavebeenabletobestowonthissubject，weareofopinion，thattheclauseintheactofincorporation，enablingthebanktosueinthecourtsoftheUnitedStates，isconsistentwiththeconstitution，andtobeobeyedinallcourts。\"
Sec。1650。CasesmayalsoariseunderlawsoftheUnitedStatesbyimplication，aswellasbyexpressenactment；so，thatdueredressmaybeadministeredbythejudicialpoweroftheUnitedStates。Itisnotunusualforalegislativeacttoinvolveconsequences，whicharenotexpressed。Anofficer，forexample，isorderedtoarrestanindividual。Itisnotnecessary，norisitusual，tosay，thatheshallnotbepunishedforobeyingthisorder。Hissecurityisimpliedintheorderitself。Itisnounusualthingforanactofcongresstoimply，withoutexpressing，thisveryexemptionfromstatecontrol。Thecollectorsoftherevenue，thecarriersofthemail，themint[*3：518]
establishment，andallthoseinstitutions，whicharepublicintheirnature，areexamplesinpoint。Ithasneverbeendoubted，thatall，whoareemployedinthem，areprotected，whileinthelineoftheirduty；andyetthisprotectionisnotexpressedinanyactofcongress。Itisincidentalto，andisimpliedin，theseveralacts，bywhichthoseinstitutionsarecreated；andissecuredtotheindividuals，employedinthem，bythejudicialpoweralone；thatis，thejudicialpoweristheinstrumentemployedbythegovernmentinadministeringthissecurity。
Sec。1651。Ithasalsobeenasked，andmayagainbeasked，whythewords，\"casesinequity，\"arefoundinthisclause？Whatequitablecausescangrowoutoftheconstitution，laws，andtreatiesoftheUnitedStates？
TothisthegeneralansweroftheFederalistseemsatonceclearandsatisfactory。